.
Feedback

Culver City School Board Approves ALLEM Agreement

The agreement between the Culver City Unified School District and the Advocates for Language Learning, formalizes the language adjuncts program at El Marino Language School.

During the first meeting of the Culver City Unified School District School Board for the new school year on Tuesday night, the Board voted unanimously in favor of an agreement between CCUSD and Advocates for Language Learning El Marino (ALLEM).

The motion by School Board Vice President Kathy Paspalis, approves the agreement, which was designed to "continue and formalize the practice of using adjuncts to provide language services at El Marino Language School."

El Marino Language School is a K-5 elementary school, which is solely dedicated to language immersion in Spanish or Japanese. The program -  the first of its kind in a public school system in the United States -  has existed since 1971 (Spanish) and 1991 (Japanese).

Since 1987, the parent-run organization ALLEM has raised funds to employ “adjuncts.” Adjuncts are native Spanish or Japanese speakers who foster language acquisition by providing support services and modeling the target language in the classroom.

The agreement was prompted by a on the El Marino adjunct program by the Culver City Association of Classified Employees during the second half of the 2011-2012 school year.  After by the District’s legal team and urged on by ALLEM and members of the community, it was determined that the adjuncts are not District employees; thus CCUSD cannot bargain on their behalf. 

Following this determination, ALLEM and the District sought a , which recognizes that adjuncts are beneficial to the El Marino students, and it formalizes the unique quarter-century practice of using adjuncts to provide language services.

Speaking at Tuesday night's meeting, ALLEM president Gina Marie Walker thanked the Board and the District for their collaboration.

“I feel it protects the best interest of the students," she said.

Speaking about the new school year, she continued, "We’re all very rested and energized and ready to start fund-raising for our adjuncts.”

Be sure to like Culver City Patch on Facebook, follow us on Twitter and sign up for our free daily newsletter for email updates.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Culver City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken Jones May 10, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Maybe more to the point, where does the methane (way more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas)Read More release go from the fracking process, where do the "secret"and other cancer causing chemicals go, and who pays for clean-up costs, increased healthcare costs of residents nearby, possible increased earthquake damage, etc. and where does this oil go (we can't use it--too dirty--so probably China)?
Theodora Crawford May 10, 2013 at 03:09 pm
As I understand it, fracking wells "dry up" fairly quickly, which is why pressure to keepRead More drilling so urgent. Where do the jobs go after a year or so? Just a thought....
Adam Rakunas April 8, 2013 at 06:45 pm
This non-apology is a joke. Still not going spend money in Culver City, dude.
Marco Anderson April 8, 2013 at 01:51 pm
Steve Rose writes "I'm a responsible car driver and I look for the same from bike riders."Read More However I challenge him to spend his next long drive staying at exactly the posted speed limit. I tried this once driving from the Long Beach Airport to Irvine. And I was astounded at how slow this felt. I also noticed that in all contexts (Freeway, Arterial, and local road) I was the only one doing so. I didn't pass or pace a single other car for the full 30 minutes. So somehow I doubt that although he may be "responsible" driving he is a fully law-abiding driver.
Yosi Sergant April 8, 2013 at 09:30 am
(....continued) Mr. Rose, your heart might have been in the right place, but you asked the wrongRead More questions and alienated bike riders in the process. More important, the approach was simply confrontational and not reflective of the changing perspective (read: progress) of the broader city on bicycle riding nor of the amazing new life blood of the those who are revitalizing the very Culver City you love and have worked so very hard for. Again, I urge you to apologize (not clarify) and perhaps come speak to some bike commuters/riders and join us in making Culver City's road's, less territorial and safer...