.
Feedback

Culver City Pre-School Students Receive Free Vision Screenings from UCLA Mobile Eye Clinic

The student screenings began back in November 2012, and some of the kids recently received free glasses, following their initial screenings.

Through the Office of Child Development, Culver City Unified School District pre-school students recently received free vision screenings provided thanks to the UCLA Mobile Eye Clinic and the Jules Stein Institute. Students began the process in November, and recently received free glasses as a result of their initial screenings in December.

All of CCUSD's six preschool sites - consisting of more than 330 students - were initially screened, including special education preschool students.

The UCLA Mobile Eye Clinic's new Child Vision Program provides screeners with hand-held Retinomax auto refractors to screen for near-sightedness, far-sightedness and astigmatism.

If a child doesn't pass the vision screening, parents/guardians are offered an appointment with the UCLA Mobile Eye Clinic (UMEC). UMEC visits the school and provides eye examinations with an ophthalmologist. If a child needs glasses, UMEC provides a free pair; and one replacement pair will also be provided if a child loses or breaks his glasses.

The UCLA Mobile Eye Clinic has been in existence since 1975 and has worked with CCUSD for many years at La Ballona and Linwood E. Howe Elementary Schools. All UMEC services are free.

Be sure to like Culver City Patch on Facebook, follow us on Twitter and sign up for our free daily newsletter for email updates.

 

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Culver City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken Jones May 10, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Maybe more to the point, where does the methane (way more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas)Read More release go from the fracking process, where do the "secret"and other cancer causing chemicals go, and who pays for clean-up costs, increased healthcare costs of residents nearby, possible increased earthquake damage, etc. and where does this oil go (we can't use it--too dirty--so probably China)?
Theodora Crawford May 10, 2013 at 03:09 pm
As I understand it, fracking wells "dry up" fairly quickly, which is why pressure to keepRead More drilling so urgent. Where do the jobs go after a year or so? Just a thought....
Adam Rakunas April 8, 2013 at 06:45 pm
This non-apology is a joke. Still not going spend money in Culver City, dude.
Marco Anderson April 8, 2013 at 01:51 pm
Steve Rose writes "I'm a responsible car driver and I look for the same from bike riders."Read More However I challenge him to spend his next long drive staying at exactly the posted speed limit. I tried this once driving from the Long Beach Airport to Irvine. And I was astounded at how slow this felt. I also noticed that in all contexts (Freeway, Arterial, and local road) I was the only one doing so. I didn't pass or pace a single other car for the full 30 minutes. So somehow I doubt that although he may be "responsible" driving he is a fully law-abiding driver.
Yosi Sergant April 8, 2013 at 09:30 am
(....continued) Mr. Rose, your heart might have been in the right place, but you asked the wrongRead More questions and alienated bike riders in the process. More important, the approach was simply confrontational and not reflective of the changing perspective (read: progress) of the broader city on bicycle riding nor of the amazing new life blood of the those who are revitalizing the very Culver City you love and have worked so very hard for. Again, I urge you to apologize (not clarify) and perhaps come speak to some bike commuters/riders and join us in making Culver City's road's, less territorial and safer...