.
Feedback

Video: Culver City Heads to the Polls

Patch caught up with locals voting in Culver City, proudly displaying their “I voted” stickers as they exited Culver City City Hall.

People were streaming into the polling station at Culver City’s City Hall at a steady clip at 11 a.m. this morning. Polling volunteer Stephon Litwinazuk who was heading out for a much needed lunch break told Patch he had been busy all morning.

“When the polls opened here at 7 a.m. there was a steady line of at least 75 people already waiting to vote,” he said. “It’s an important election so I’m glad people are showing up.”

City Councilmember Meghan Sahli-Wells was also on hand to cast her ballot and told Patch, “Wow, it took quite a while to vote, it was very busy in there.”

Sahli-Wells, who will be holding an election night party this evening, said there were many important issues on the ballot this year, including of course, Culver City’s Measure Y half-cent sales tax, which she hopes will pass.

Janice Steger said she came to vote first and foremost “for the President!” and said the most important ballots for her were Propositions 30, 32 and 38. She also said she voted “Yes” on Measure Y.

Daniella Orhuela-Gruber, dressed in a unique Doctor Who Tardis dress said GMO labeling and Measure B were the most important items on her agenda (See attached video). She too said she voted “Yes” on Measure Y.

Dana Zelazny’s two dogs Tofu and Sesame (‘My daughter’s a vegan and I landed up having to take her dogs”), waited patiently while their owner went inside to vote.

“I always vote,” Zelazny said. “My son and I came together. “I voted “Yes” on Measure Y because it’s very important to Culver City,” she said. “And I also think it’s important that we label GMOs (Prop 37).”

None of the people Patch interviewed coming out of the polls voted “No” on Measure Y. But as Sahli-Wells told Patch, “You never know. We’ll have to wait until all the votes are counted.”

Did you vote? Share your polling place experiences in the comments section, below.

Click here to add your own voting pics to our gallery.

Be sure to like Culver City Patch on Facebook, follow us on Twitter and sign up for our free daily newsletter for email updates.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Culver City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken Jones May 10, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Maybe more to the point, where does the methane (way more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas)Read More release go from the fracking process, where do the "secret"and other cancer causing chemicals go, and who pays for clean-up costs, increased healthcare costs of residents nearby, possible increased earthquake damage, etc. and where does this oil go (we can't use it--too dirty--so probably China)?
Theodora Crawford May 10, 2013 at 03:09 pm
As I understand it, fracking wells "dry up" fairly quickly, which is why pressure to keepRead More drilling so urgent. Where do the jobs go after a year or so? Just a thought....
Adam Rakunas April 8, 2013 at 06:45 pm
This non-apology is a joke. Still not going spend money in Culver City, dude.
Marco Anderson April 8, 2013 at 01:51 pm
Steve Rose writes "I'm a responsible car driver and I look for the same from bike riders."Read More However I challenge him to spend his next long drive staying at exactly the posted speed limit. I tried this once driving from the Long Beach Airport to Irvine. And I was astounded at how slow this felt. I also noticed that in all contexts (Freeway, Arterial, and local road) I was the only one doing so. I didn't pass or pace a single other car for the full 30 minutes. So somehow I doubt that although he may be "responsible" driving he is a fully law-abiding driver.
Yosi Sergant April 8, 2013 at 09:30 am
(....continued) Mr. Rose, your heart might have been in the right place, but you asked the wrongRead More questions and alienated bike riders in the process. More important, the approach was simply confrontational and not reflective of the changing perspective (read: progress) of the broader city on bicycle riding nor of the amazing new life blood of the those who are revitalizing the very Culver City you love and have worked so very hard for. Again, I urge you to apologize (not clarify) and perhaps come speak to some bike commuters/riders and join us in making Culver City's road's, less territorial and safer...