.
Feedback

TSA to Allow Small Knives on Planes

The Transportation Security Administration relaxes some security rules for commercial aircraft. Golf clubs and hockey sticks also will be allowed in cabins. What do you think of this latest decision?

Want to take a small knife on your next plane trip? It'll be OK soon.

The federal Transportation Security Administration has relaxed some of its security rules. People will now be allowed to bring small knives in cabins of commercial jets.

The Los Angeles Times reported that the policy change, which will take effect April 25, was immediately criticized by flight attendants and passenger rights groups. They say the move will create an unnecessary risk and further crowd overhead bins.

"While we agree that a passenger wielding a small knife or swinging a golf club or hockey stick poses less of a threat to the pilot locked in the cockpit, these are real threats to passengers and flight attendants in the passenger cabin," said Stacy K. Martin, president of Southwest Airlines' flight attendants union, TWU Local 556.

-- Do you feel the new TSA rules will affect passenger safety on airlines? Share your opinions on the changes in the comments below.

The TSA list of prohibited items will no longer include small knives with non-locking blades less than 2.36 inches (6 centimeters) long and 1/2-inch wide, according to the report.

Sporting equipment such as golf clubs, billiard cues, ski poles, toy bats and hockey and lacrosse sticks will also now be allowed.

The Association of Professional Flight Attendants, which represents attendants for American Airlines, told the Times that the group worries that allowing sporting equipment in the cabin will lead to more problems for passengers and flight attendants.

"There's less space than ever in overhead bins, and on some particular aircraft safely storing these large items will be impossible," said Kelly Skyles, of the flight attendants group. "Add to that the cramped confines of an airplane cabin, and you have the potential for passengers getting hit with these items during boarding and deplaning. It's a recipe for disaster."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Culver City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken Jones May 10, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Maybe more to the point, where does the methane (way more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas)Read More release go from the fracking process, where do the "secret"and other cancer causing chemicals go, and who pays for clean-up costs, increased healthcare costs of residents nearby, possible increased earthquake damage, etc. and where does this oil go (we can't use it--too dirty--so probably China)?
Theodora Crawford May 10, 2013 at 03:09 pm
As I understand it, fracking wells "dry up" fairly quickly, which is why pressure to keepRead More drilling so urgent. Where do the jobs go after a year or so? Just a thought....
Adam Rakunas April 8, 2013 at 06:45 pm
This non-apology is a joke. Still not going spend money in Culver City, dude.
Marco Anderson April 8, 2013 at 01:51 pm
Steve Rose writes "I'm a responsible car driver and I look for the same from bike riders."Read More However I challenge him to spend his next long drive staying at exactly the posted speed limit. I tried this once driving from the Long Beach Airport to Irvine. And I was astounded at how slow this felt. I also noticed that in all contexts (Freeway, Arterial, and local road) I was the only one doing so. I didn't pass or pace a single other car for the full 30 minutes. So somehow I doubt that although he may be "responsible" driving he is a fully law-abiding driver.
Yosi Sergant April 8, 2013 at 09:30 am
(....continued) Mr. Rose, your heart might have been in the right place, but you asked the wrongRead More questions and alienated bike riders in the process. More important, the approach was simply confrontational and not reflective of the changing perspective (read: progress) of the broader city on bicycle riding nor of the amazing new life blood of the those who are revitalizing the very Culver City you love and have worked so very hard for. Again, I urge you to apologize (not clarify) and perhaps come speak to some bike commuters/riders and join us in making Culver City's road's, less territorial and safer...