.
Feedback

Sen. Curren Price Introduces Bill Requiring Coroners to Report Prescription Drug Deaths to Medical Boards

State Senator Curren D. Price Jr. (D-Culver City) introduced SB 62 saying the bill would give medical boards information that would allow them to take action against their licensees, if necessary.

State Senator Curren D. Price, Jr. (D-Culver City) introduced SB 62 Tuesday that would ensure state licensing boards have information as soon as possible to determine the role that doctors and pharmacists may have had in patient prescription drug deaths.

 “Coroners reports are a treasure trove of data that can inform us about where people are getting drugs, how much they have in their system when they die of an overdose and whether they were under the care of a doctor who may have been prescribing too much,” Price said in an official release. “This bill connects the dots and creates a very necessary pathway for prescription drug overdose deaths to be reported directly to the Boards that can take necessary action against their licensees who may have been directly involved. “

Price added, “If Boards are receiving reports from coroners throughout the state, they will be better armed with the necessary tools to make a determination whether there may be a link to their licensees in overprescribing circumstances and take action.”

Current law only requires coroner’s reports to be transmitted to the Medical Board of California in the event that gross negligence by a physician is determined as the cause of death. 

In a recent Los Angeles Times series coroners reports from four counties found that in nearly half of the cases where prescription drug overdose was listed as the cause of death, there was a direct connection to a prescribing physician. The series also found that more than 80 of the doctors whose names were listed on prescription bottles found at the home of, or on the body of, a person who died had been the prescribing physician for three or more dead patients – and in the case of one doctor, as many as 16 dead patients. 

 “Patients and the public cannot be completely protected if we are not improving every opportunity for better reporting and arming the licensing boards with the necessary information to take a better look at their licensees,” said Price.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Culver City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken Jones May 10, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Maybe more to the point, where does the methane (way more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas)Read More release go from the fracking process, where do the "secret"and other cancer causing chemicals go, and who pays for clean-up costs, increased healthcare costs of residents nearby, possible increased earthquake damage, etc. and where does this oil go (we can't use it--too dirty--so probably China)?
Theodora Crawford May 10, 2013 at 03:09 pm
As I understand it, fracking wells "dry up" fairly quickly, which is why pressure to keepRead More drilling so urgent. Where do the jobs go after a year or so? Just a thought....
Adam Rakunas April 8, 2013 at 06:45 pm
This non-apology is a joke. Still not going spend money in Culver City, dude.
Marco Anderson April 8, 2013 at 01:51 pm
Steve Rose writes "I'm a responsible car driver and I look for the same from bike riders."Read More However I challenge him to spend his next long drive staying at exactly the posted speed limit. I tried this once driving from the Long Beach Airport to Irvine. And I was astounded at how slow this felt. I also noticed that in all contexts (Freeway, Arterial, and local road) I was the only one doing so. I didn't pass or pace a single other car for the full 30 minutes. So somehow I doubt that although he may be "responsible" driving he is a fully law-abiding driver.
Yosi Sergant April 8, 2013 at 09:30 am
(....continued) Mr. Rose, your heart might have been in the right place, but you asked the wrongRead More questions and alienated bike riders in the process. More important, the approach was simply confrontational and not reflective of the changing perspective (read: progress) of the broader city on bicycle riding nor of the amazing new life blood of the those who are revitalizing the very Culver City you love and have worked so very hard for. Again, I urge you to apologize (not clarify) and perhaps come speak to some bike commuters/riders and join us in making Culver City's road's, less territorial and safer...