.
Feedback

POLL: Will You Vote Tuesday to Increase California's Tobacco Tax?

Proposition 29 proposes adding $1 to the price of each cigarette pack sold in California.

There aren't many statewide propositions on the June 5 primary election ballot, but one in particular is drawing controversy.

Proposition 29 would add an additional $1 tax to each pack of cigarettes sold in California, bringing the total per-pack tax to $1.87. The $1 increase is estimated to generate more than $700 million annually, with most of the revenue going toward cancer research. 

The tobacco industry opposes the measure and has been spending heavily to defeat it. Ads opposing Prop 29 point out that a new bureaucracy with little accountability to the people will be created to oversee the funds.  

The Los Angeles Times editorial board came out against the proposal, saying the state of California has more pressing needs than paying for medical research—like keeping schools and parks open. Tobacco taxes also often face criticism that they are regressive, hitting poor people the hardest.

Proponents, however, point to studies showing that boosting taxes on tobacco can influence smokers to quit.

recent poll showed California voters supporting the tax, 50 percent to 42 percent.

Do you support the proposed tobacco tax? If you smoke, would you try harder to quit if cigarette prices go up? Vote in our poll and share your comments below.

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Culver City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken Jones May 10, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Maybe more to the point, where does the methane (way more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas)Read More release go from the fracking process, where do the "secret"and other cancer causing chemicals go, and who pays for clean-up costs, increased healthcare costs of residents nearby, possible increased earthquake damage, etc. and where does this oil go (we can't use it--too dirty--so probably China)?
Theodora Crawford May 10, 2013 at 03:09 pm
As I understand it, fracking wells "dry up" fairly quickly, which is why pressure to keepRead More drilling so urgent. Where do the jobs go after a year or so? Just a thought....