.
Feedback

Parcel B Back on City Council Agenda Tonight

The council will discuss a resolution to approve the terms and conditions agreed upon with the Combined Properties/Hudson Pacific group back in January, to develop the property at 9300 Culver Blvd.

It’s been eight and a half months since the City Council selected the Combined Properties/Hudson Pacific Group to develop Parcel B at 9300 Culver Blvd.

, the City’s newly formed agency – known as the Successor Agency – must now officially approve the terms and conditions of the Disposition and Development Agreement, which was entered into with the developer on Jan. 31, 2012.

The agreement with Combined/Hudson includes the redevelopment of Parcel B including the development of a high quality office and retail complex, subterranean private and public parking improvements, and other public improvements relating to the expansion of the existing Town Plaza Project. 

Mayor Andy Weissman told Patch that the resolution “primarily approves, subject to specific conditions precedent, the City’s transfer to the Successor Agency of the residual proceeds received by the City from the sale of that portion of the Parcel B Property defined in the DDA as the “Developer Parcel” to the Developer pursuant to the terms and conditions of the DDA.”

Tonight’s meeting will take place in City Hall Chambers at 7 p.m., after the mayor and council members as part of the lead up to Fiesta La Ballona.

Be sure to like Culver City Patch on Facebook and follow us on Twitter

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Culver City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken Jones May 10, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Maybe more to the point, where does the methane (way more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas)Read More release go from the fracking process, where do the "secret"and other cancer causing chemicals go, and who pays for clean-up costs, increased healthcare costs of residents nearby, possible increased earthquake damage, etc. and where does this oil go (we can't use it--too dirty--so probably China)?
Theodora Crawford May 10, 2013 at 03:09 pm
As I understand it, fracking wells "dry up" fairly quickly, which is why pressure to keepRead More drilling so urgent. Where do the jobs go after a year or so? Just a thought....
Adam Rakunas April 8, 2013 at 06:45 pm
This non-apology is a joke. Still not going spend money in Culver City, dude.
Marco Anderson April 8, 2013 at 01:51 pm
Steve Rose writes "I'm a responsible car driver and I look for the same from bike riders."Read More However I challenge him to spend his next long drive staying at exactly the posted speed limit. I tried this once driving from the Long Beach Airport to Irvine. And I was astounded at how slow this felt. I also noticed that in all contexts (Freeway, Arterial, and local road) I was the only one doing so. I didn't pass or pace a single other car for the full 30 minutes. So somehow I doubt that although he may be "responsible" driving he is a fully law-abiding driver.
Yosi Sergant April 8, 2013 at 09:30 am
(....continued) Mr. Rose, your heart might have been in the right place, but you asked the wrongRead More questions and alienated bike riders in the process. More important, the approach was simply confrontational and not reflective of the changing perspective (read: progress) of the broader city on bicycle riding nor of the amazing new life blood of the those who are revitalizing the very Culver City you love and have worked so very hard for. Again, I urge you to apologize (not clarify) and perhaps come speak to some bike commuters/riders and join us in making Culver City's road's, less territorial and safer...