.
Feedback

Brown Brings Case for Cuts, Taxes to Los Angeles

Gov. Jerry Brown took questions from City Council members and said he would not postpone dissolving redevelopment agencies.

Gov. Jerry Brown came to Los Angeles City Hall on Thursday to push for budget cuts, infrastructure investments, pension reform and a temporary sales tax increase to help close an expected $9.2 billion state budget shortfall for the upcoming fiscal year.

In a 26 minute speech before Los Angeles elected officials and labor and business leaders, Brown painted a picture of a state forced to cut good programs that have grown too large while struggling to pay for basic public services like education. The state is also failing to make what he described as visionary investments in long term transportation and environmental infrastructure projects.

Brown faulted people he called "declinists," who he said annually predict the demise of the state's economy, culture and politics.

"California has big problems, but rumors of its demise are greatly exaggerated," Brown told the audience of more than two hundred packed into the Public Works board room.

He said 2012 is a year of opportunity when state government can "stimulate jobs, build renewable energy, reduce pollution and greenhouse gases and launch the nation's only high-speed rail system."

He brushed aside critics of the proposed high-speed rail system, saying the nearly $100 billion rail project has his "strong support."

He also said a new business plan for the system would be out within weeks that would allay critics and, with legislative approval, allow construction on a first phase in the Central Valley to begin by the end of the year.

"If you agree that California will continue to grow, as I do, and that millions  ... more people will be living in our state, then it's a wise investment," Brown said.

Building new airport runways and roads and highways is the only alternative to high-speed rail and would cost more, he told the audience.

Brown called for an overhaul of the education funding system he said would divide money more fairly among schools based on demographics like income levels and the percentage of students who speak English as a second language. He called for more responsibility in public education to be given to school districts.

"What most needs to be avoided is concentrating more and more decision making at the state or federal level," he said.

The governor issued a call for pension reform for newly hired government employees, based on what he described as a fundamentally unsustainable system.

"The way it looks to me is that a lot of people, increasingly the majority of them, are going to be living on their retirement longer than the years they worked, and there are fewer people entering the workforce to support that retirement," Brown said.

Brown took questions from officials including City Councilmen Tom LaBonge, Bill Rosendahl and Paul Koretz.

Koretz asked the governor to consider delaying the Feb. 1 deadline for redevelopment agencies to dissolve themselves, saying it was causing unnecessary chaos and would lead to more lawsuits if not pushed back several months.

Brown shot the idea down. "I don't think we can delay this funeral," he said, adding later. "Don't worry about lawsuits. We are sued every day."

Related story: 

Councilman Eric Garcetti, a candidate for mayor, said Brown "absolutely" made the case for a tax increase, saying the proposal would be smaller than the taxes Californians were paying several years ago.

"We can't get good schools without investing in them. We can't get good roads and water without investing. That was always the California way. We pay and it paid us back many times."

"We can live cheaply in the short term, but it's very expensive in the long term," Garcetti added.

County Supervisor Mike Antonovich accused Brown of using "bully" tactics to gain support for tax increases.

"Threatening voters with draconian cuts in public safety and education if they don't approve his tax increases is a typical scare tactic used by bully politicians who have failed to initiate reforms and improve government efficiency," Antonovich said.

Instead, Antonovich said Brown should start by restructuring some parts of state government, including joining the departments that manage Medi-Cal, CalWorks and Food Stamps, which he said could save the state $1.2 billion over five years.

Be sure to like Culver City Patch on Facebook and follow us on Twitter

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Culver City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken Jones May 10, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Maybe more to the point, where does the methane (way more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas)Read More release go from the fracking process, where do the "secret"and other cancer causing chemicals go, and who pays for clean-up costs, increased healthcare costs of residents nearby, possible increased earthquake damage, etc. and where does this oil go (we can't use it--too dirty--so probably China)?
Theodora Crawford May 10, 2013 at 03:09 pm
As I understand it, fracking wells "dry up" fairly quickly, which is why pressure to keepRead More drilling so urgent. Where do the jobs go after a year or so? Just a thought....
Adam Rakunas April 8, 2013 at 06:45 pm
This non-apology is a joke. Still not going spend money in Culver City, dude.
Marco Anderson April 8, 2013 at 01:51 pm
Steve Rose writes "I'm a responsible car driver and I look for the same from bike riders."Read More However I challenge him to spend his next long drive staying at exactly the posted speed limit. I tried this once driving from the Long Beach Airport to Irvine. And I was astounded at how slow this felt. I also noticed that in all contexts (Freeway, Arterial, and local road) I was the only one doing so. I didn't pass or pace a single other car for the full 30 minutes. So somehow I doubt that although he may be "responsible" driving he is a fully law-abiding driver.
Yosi Sergant April 8, 2013 at 09:30 am
(....continued) Mr. Rose, your heart might have been in the right place, but you asked the wrongRead More questions and alienated bike riders in the process. More important, the approach was simply confrontational and not reflective of the changing perspective (read: progress) of the broader city on bicycle riding nor of the amazing new life blood of the those who are revitalizing the very Culver City you love and have worked so very hard for. Again, I urge you to apologize (not clarify) and perhaps come speak to some bike commuters/riders and join us in making Culver City's road's, less territorial and safer...