.
Feedback

Culver City Real Estate Market Year End Review

So here we are at the start of a new year. A great time for reflection and also to look at what may lie ahead.

Let's take a look at the Culver City real estate market and see how prices have fared in 2012. It's also a good placeholder to see what the longer-term trends look like.

Single Family Homes

The chart to the right shows the average home price (annualized for the entire year, so it takes out the peaks and troughs) from 2006 to 2012, you can clearly see the price for a single family home in 2012 bounced back significantly.

As I have indicated all year long in my monthly video reviews, low inventory and a huge increase in buyer traffic, have contributed to this jump up in values.

There were only 149 houses sold in all of 2012, this is the lowest number I've seen since I started selling real estate in 2000.

These dynamics have given all the advantages back to seller after four years of a very strong buyer’s market. Of course, the driver for this high buyer turnout is low interest rates. There doesn't appear to be any jump in rates on the immediate horizon, so we should see home prices continue their northerly trend.

Condominium and Townhomes

The long-term trend for Culver City condos and townhomes, as you can see from the chart, has taken a different path than that of Single Family Homes.

The interest level for condos took much longer to ignite than houses, not entirely sure why, but my guess is with rates this low, buyers were trying to squeeze into a house if they could find a way to stretch their money.

However, even though the trend you see is still downward in this chart, the month of December saw a huge price jump to an average sold price of $336,000. This is way above the yearly average of $299,000. 

Looks like 2013 will be the turnaround year for condos and townhomes and we will see prices start to climb out of the decline they have been in for the last four or five years.

Be sure to like Culver City Patch on Facebook, follow us on Twitter and sign up for our free daily newsletter for email updates.

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Culver City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken Jones May 10, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Maybe more to the point, where does the methane (way more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas)Read More release go from the fracking process, where do the "secret"and other cancer causing chemicals go, and who pays for clean-up costs, increased healthcare costs of residents nearby, possible increased earthquake damage, etc. and where does this oil go (we can't use it--too dirty--so probably China)?
Theodora Crawford May 10, 2013 at 03:09 pm
As I understand it, fracking wells "dry up" fairly quickly, which is why pressure to keepRead More drilling so urgent. Where do the jobs go after a year or so? Just a thought....
Adam Rakunas April 8, 2013 at 06:45 pm
This non-apology is a joke. Still not going spend money in Culver City, dude.
Marco Anderson April 8, 2013 at 01:51 pm
Steve Rose writes "I'm a responsible car driver and I look for the same from bike riders."Read More However I challenge him to spend his next long drive staying at exactly the posted speed limit. I tried this once driving from the Long Beach Airport to Irvine. And I was astounded at how slow this felt. I also noticed that in all contexts (Freeway, Arterial, and local road) I was the only one doing so. I didn't pass or pace a single other car for the full 30 minutes. So somehow I doubt that although he may be "responsible" driving he is a fully law-abiding driver.
Yosi Sergant April 8, 2013 at 09:30 am
(....continued) Mr. Rose, your heart might have been in the right place, but you asked the wrongRead More questions and alienated bike riders in the process. More important, the approach was simply confrontational and not reflective of the changing perspective (read: progress) of the broader city on bicycle riding nor of the amazing new life blood of the those who are revitalizing the very Culver City you love and have worked so very hard for. Again, I urge you to apologize (not clarify) and perhaps come speak to some bike commuters/riders and join us in making Culver City's road's, less territorial and safer...