.
Feedback

All For 1 Co-Chair: Keep the Culver City Education Foundation Campaign Going

Although CCEF's All For 1 campaign is most visible at the beginning of the school year, contributions are appreciated all year long.

The Culver City Education Foundation (CCEF) All For 1 campaign has been running full force for over a month. All for 1 is designed to bring in funds at the beginning of the school year so that the Foundation can be ready to donate to the programs our schools need most, when they need it most.  When directing AFO donations, CCEF wants to be responsive to community concerns.  The survey we conducted last June was a part of that process.  On the basis of that input, All For 1 funding this year will be targeted at math, science, technology and the arts.

Although CCEF's All For 1 campaign is most visible at the beginning of the school year, contributions are appreciated all year long. We strive for 100 percent community participation because when we all join together, our contributions large and small become a vital force in support of our Culver City students. You can make a one-time donation or spread your payments over a ten-month period, and all donations are tax deductible. You can even get a lawn sign for a gift totaling $100 or more. So please visit www.ccef90230.org/donate and be as generous as you can within your family’s means.

For over 30 years CCEF has been raising the additional funds needed to transform and enrich the education of every child in our Culver City schools. My own children are recent graduates from Culver High, but as a Culver City resident I know how much our family still benefits from keeping our schools strong.  It isn’t just the strong property values that come from maintaining our schools’ excellence; a robust school system produces good citizens for our community as well.  Most of all, I take joy in the accomplishments of our Culver City kids— their success made possible through our support of CCEF and All for 1. Everyone benefits when our Culver City schools thrive and our students achieve.


Susannah Baxendale
All For 1, Co-Chair

Editor's note: Letters may be edited for brevity and clarity.

Be sure to like Culver City Patch on Facebook, follow us on Twitter and sign up for our free daily newsletter for email updates.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Culver City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken Jones May 10, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Maybe more to the point, where does the methane (way more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas)Read More release go from the fracking process, where do the "secret"and other cancer causing chemicals go, and who pays for clean-up costs, increased healthcare costs of residents nearby, possible increased earthquake damage, etc. and where does this oil go (we can't use it--too dirty--so probably China)?
Theodora Crawford May 10, 2013 at 03:09 pm
As I understand it, fracking wells "dry up" fairly quickly, which is why pressure to keepRead More drilling so urgent. Where do the jobs go after a year or so? Just a thought....
Adam Rakunas April 8, 2013 at 06:45 pm
This non-apology is a joke. Still not going spend money in Culver City, dude.
Marco Anderson April 8, 2013 at 01:51 pm
Steve Rose writes "I'm a responsible car driver and I look for the same from bike riders."Read More However I challenge him to spend his next long drive staying at exactly the posted speed limit. I tried this once driving from the Long Beach Airport to Irvine. And I was astounded at how slow this felt. I also noticed that in all contexts (Freeway, Arterial, and local road) I was the only one doing so. I didn't pass or pace a single other car for the full 30 minutes. So somehow I doubt that although he may be "responsible" driving he is a fully law-abiding driver.
Yosi Sergant April 8, 2013 at 09:30 am
(....continued) Mr. Rose, your heart might have been in the right place, but you asked the wrongRead More questions and alienated bike riders in the process. More important, the approach was simply confrontational and not reflective of the changing perspective (read: progress) of the broader city on bicycle riding nor of the amazing new life blood of the those who are revitalizing the very Culver City you love and have worked so very hard for. Again, I urge you to apologize (not clarify) and perhaps come speak to some bike commuters/riders and join us in making Culver City's road's, less territorial and safer...