.
Feedback

Update: Man Found Dead on Culver City Expo Line Identified

Bernard Bettis, 48, was a resident of Long Beach. An autopsy will be performed on Wednesday to determine the cause of death.

A man found dead on an elevated section of Expo Line tracks in Culver City over the weekend was identified Tuesday as a 48-year-old Long Beach resident.

Assistant Coroner Chief Ed Winter said an autopsy is scheduled for Wednesday on the body of Bernard Bettis, but early indications are that the first reported fatality on the Expo Line may have been the result of an accidental fall.

Sgt. Andrew Bedogne of the sheriff's Transit Bureau said the victim "wasn't hit by a train'' and showed no signs of trauma, and Metro spokesman Rick Jager said the man "may have fallen from the platform area, onto the tracks.''

Los Angeles city firefighters were sent to Platform 2 at the Culver City Station, 8804 W. Washington Blvd., at 1:19 a.m. Sunday and declared Bettis dead.

The investigation was turned over to the sheriff's Transit Services Bureau, which is charge of policing Metro trains, buses and stations.

Expo trains, which run until about 2 a.m. on weekends, get their electricity from overhead lines, and no electrical malfunction was reported.

The Culver City Station is at the end of the above-ground line, and trains routinely creep into it to stop at a barrier just before the tracks end, 40 feet above the ground.

The Culver City Station is elevated above Washington Boulevard, but the victim apparently did not fall further than the three feet from the platform to the tracks, Jager said.

Service on the Expo Line began June 20.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Culver City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken Jones May 10, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Maybe more to the point, where does the methane (way more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas)Read More release go from the fracking process, where do the "secret"and other cancer causing chemicals go, and who pays for clean-up costs, increased healthcare costs of residents nearby, possible increased earthquake damage, etc. and where does this oil go (we can't use it--too dirty--so probably China)?
Theodora Crawford May 10, 2013 at 03:09 pm
As I understand it, fracking wells "dry up" fairly quickly, which is why pressure to keepRead More drilling so urgent. Where do the jobs go after a year or so? Just a thought....
Adam Rakunas April 8, 2013 at 06:45 pm
This non-apology is a joke. Still not going spend money in Culver City, dude.
Marco Anderson April 8, 2013 at 01:51 pm
Steve Rose writes "I'm a responsible car driver and I look for the same from bike riders."Read More However I challenge him to spend his next long drive staying at exactly the posted speed limit. I tried this once driving from the Long Beach Airport to Irvine. And I was astounded at how slow this felt. I also noticed that in all contexts (Freeway, Arterial, and local road) I was the only one doing so. I didn't pass or pace a single other car for the full 30 minutes. So somehow I doubt that although he may be "responsible" driving he is a fully law-abiding driver.
Yosi Sergant April 8, 2013 at 09:30 am
(....continued) Mr. Rose, your heart might have been in the right place, but you asked the wrongRead More questions and alienated bike riders in the process. More important, the approach was simply confrontational and not reflective of the changing perspective (read: progress) of the broader city on bicycle riding nor of the amazing new life blood of the those who are revitalizing the very Culver City you love and have worked so very hard for. Again, I urge you to apologize (not clarify) and perhaps come speak to some bike commuters/riders and join us in making Culver City's road's, less territorial and safer...