.
Feedback

420 Poll: Should Marijuana Be Legalized?

Today is April 20, a day when Southern California pot smokers will celebrate an unofficial holiday, while activists against and for the legalization of marijuana take action.

Happy 4/20.

According to a number of websites, including ABC News, the term "420" was coined by kids at a Northern California high school in 1971. And on a day that bears the 4/20 date, many marijuana smokers observe the day with celebrations. But others take action.

The University of Colorado Boulder has been the setting for an annual 4/20 event, which historically drew nearly 10,000 people each year, according to the Huffington Post Denver. However, this year, CU officials decided to close the campus on April 20, stating that the university ends up paying about $50,000 in security personnel costs, reported local television station ABC7 Denver.

Here in Los Angeles, marijuana activists will gather to protest pot laws at Los Angeles City Hall, according to Cannabis Culture, a marijuana magazine. LAist also reported there will be a secret dinner planned in downtown L.A. Friday night. According to the site, the dinner will feature an herbal cuisine, like monkfish seared with "cannabis-infused coconut oil."

According to the Sacramento Bee, a group called Citizens Against Legalizing Marijuana is calling April 20 "National No Pot Day." The group was at the state capitol Thursday morning handing out its "parents' pledge to educate their kids about marijuana," according to the report.

  • For the full story about myths and facts about 4/20 from ABC News, click here.
  • For the full story about the University of Colorado Boulder 4/20 event from the Huffington Post Denver, click here.
  • For the full story about the University of Colorado Boulder 4/20 event from the ABC7 station in Denver, click here.
  • For the full list of 4/20 activities from Cannabis Culture, click here.
  • For the story about the secret 4/20 dinner in downtown Los Angeles from LAist, click here.
  • For the full story about the Citizens Against Legalizing Marijuana from the Sacramento Bee, click here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Culver City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken Jones May 10, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Maybe more to the point, where does the methane (way more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas)Read More release go from the fracking process, where do the "secret"and other cancer causing chemicals go, and who pays for clean-up costs, increased healthcare costs of residents nearby, possible increased earthquake damage, etc. and where does this oil go (we can't use it--too dirty--so probably China)?
Theodora Crawford May 10, 2013 at 03:09 pm
As I understand it, fracking wells "dry up" fairly quickly, which is why pressure to keepRead More drilling so urgent. Where do the jobs go after a year or so? Just a thought....
Adam Rakunas April 8, 2013 at 06:45 pm
This non-apology is a joke. Still not going spend money in Culver City, dude.
Marco Anderson April 8, 2013 at 01:51 pm
Steve Rose writes "I'm a responsible car driver and I look for the same from bike riders."Read More However I challenge him to spend his next long drive staying at exactly the posted speed limit. I tried this once driving from the Long Beach Airport to Irvine. And I was astounded at how slow this felt. I also noticed that in all contexts (Freeway, Arterial, and local road) I was the only one doing so. I didn't pass or pace a single other car for the full 30 minutes. So somehow I doubt that although he may be "responsible" driving he is a fully law-abiding driver.
Yosi Sergant April 8, 2013 at 09:30 am
(....continued) Mr. Rose, your heart might have been in the right place, but you asked the wrongRead More questions and alienated bike riders in the process. More important, the approach was simply confrontational and not reflective of the changing perspective (read: progress) of the broader city on bicycle riding nor of the amazing new life blood of the those who are revitalizing the very Culver City you love and have worked so very hard for. Again, I urge you to apologize (not clarify) and perhaps come speak to some bike commuters/riders and join us in making Culver City's road's, less territorial and safer...