.
Feedback

Stop Signs, More Stop Signs

More Stop Signs - Poor Decision?

Well, the new stop signs are in (still covered), on Sawtelle Blvd, north and south bound at Hayter Ave. You knew this (and more...) was coming if you've been following things. We know this is in direct response to the wheelchair "pedestrian" that was struck and killed just north of this location recently, and while that was a tragedy, it should be noted that this person was crossing Sawtelle where it is marked on both the east and west sides with sings "Do Not Cross".

I say "this and more", because the long range plan is to install a traffic signal at Hayter Ave. Now, I don't disagree with a safer way to cross Sawtelle Blvd, but I feel this is the wrong way to go about it, though I do fully expect it to generate revenue for the city via CCPD, and in particular by their motor officers (who often "patrol" this area with speed traps). Oh, and speaking of which, the two electronic "Your Speed Is" signs along this stretch... the ones that rarely are working... Maybe they'd be more of a deterrent IF they worked.

Anyway, as I was saying, its not that I don't feel there could be a safer way to cross Sawtelle, especially considering the elementary school that is only one block west, but I think there is a better / safer way to accomplish this AND still keep traffic moving. I wish the powers that be would consider a pedestrian crossing light (remember, they are already planning to install the infrastructure to support a traffic signal) much like we have on Culver Blvd, just west of Elenda St. This light blinks yellow all the time, helping to remind drivers that there may be others using the sidewalks and roads, AND will switch to a blinking RED light when the crossing button is pushed.

Installing this sort of pedestrian assistance not only allows the pedestrian to directly influence their ability to cross, but keeps traffic moving without impediment at all other times.

Oh well, I'm sure this sort to logical thinking will be overlooked in favor of yet another stop sign / stop light, greater noise and pollution for the residents in the immediate area, and more traffic violations (more $) for the city.

Maybe we just make it really safe, and profitable, for everyone... we'll just put a stop sign or light at EVERY intersection in the city?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Culver City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken Jones May 10, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Maybe more to the point, where does the methane (way more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas)Read More release go from the fracking process, where do the "secret"and other cancer causing chemicals go, and who pays for clean-up costs, increased healthcare costs of residents nearby, possible increased earthquake damage, etc. and where does this oil go (we can't use it--too dirty--so probably China)?
Theodora Crawford May 10, 2013 at 03:09 pm
As I understand it, fracking wells "dry up" fairly quickly, which is why pressure to keepRead More drilling so urgent. Where do the jobs go after a year or so? Just a thought....
Adam Rakunas April 8, 2013 at 06:45 pm
This non-apology is a joke. Still not going spend money in Culver City, dude.
Marco Anderson April 8, 2013 at 01:51 pm
Steve Rose writes "I'm a responsible car driver and I look for the same from bike riders."Read More However I challenge him to spend his next long drive staying at exactly the posted speed limit. I tried this once driving from the Long Beach Airport to Irvine. And I was astounded at how slow this felt. I also noticed that in all contexts (Freeway, Arterial, and local road) I was the only one doing so. I didn't pass or pace a single other car for the full 30 minutes. So somehow I doubt that although he may be "responsible" driving he is a fully law-abiding driver.
Yosi Sergant April 8, 2013 at 09:30 am
(....continued) Mr. Rose, your heart might have been in the right place, but you asked the wrongRead More questions and alienated bike riders in the process. More important, the approach was simply confrontational and not reflective of the changing perspective (read: progress) of the broader city on bicycle riding nor of the amazing new life blood of the those who are revitalizing the very Culver City you love and have worked so very hard for. Again, I urge you to apologize (not clarify) and perhaps come speak to some bike commuters/riders and join us in making Culver City's road's, less territorial and safer...