.
Feedback

Blog: Culver City Planning Commission Rubber Stamps New 7-Eleven

How can it be that the people who don't know the area and haven't studied all the data are the ones who decide what happens? No more. #Occupy.

Surprisingly, the Planning Commission has approved the Swerdlow at 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard. In spite of efforts by local residents over a period of years to raise the consciousness of government and committee members who decide these things, it now feels very possible that we will have our sixth 7-Eleven within city boundaries and a third one located on Sepulveda for those who enjoy stopping at two minute intervals to refill their soda cups.

Imagine that. Three on one street from Jefferson Boulevard to Venice Boulevard. Even though the property has stood vacant for more than a decade, must we be out of our skulls to think it's possible that our community really needs three 7-Eleven shops in such a short space?!

Blight. Bad. Graffiti. Bad. Trash. Bad. Congestion. Bad. Eyesore. Bad.

We all agree that the undeveloped property is overdue for a new commercial inhabitant. That abandoned gas station needs to go bye-bye. Come walk around the area and see for yourself if you think a 7-Eleven fits with what already exists. If you don't come hang out for at least 25 minutes a day over a period of days in this area, then what gives you the right to decide what happens there?

No joke. The Planning Commission approved a project for an area that they do not fully understand. They have not viewed the traffic study video. They have not viewed the resident-created traffic videos. Four of the committee members admitted to having never seen the intersection to watch traffic. Again, I ask, what gives these people the right to decide what happens at 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard? This is a bad movie script that I do not want to see produced.

I am personally calling out each and every member of the Planning Commission, the City Council, and every person who serves the City in an official capacity to spend some time at Braddock and Sepulveda. Tweet at me when you're there. Go get something eat, walk around a bit on up to Culver Boulevard, get a feel for the place. Understand the patterns. I hope Aaron Swerdlow will join us, too. He might get some other ideas for what to develop on the property.

We are overdue for some food truck fun. I'll start calling a few and we'll have an event to help everyone remember that this is our City and 7-Eleven is not welcome.

Stay Tuned for the CountdownToAppeal June 8

If you're interested in working with a small cadre of concerned residents who are officially filing an appeal to the Planning Commission's decision, please contact me via email: bryan@bryansanders.com because the more the merrier and we have only 15 days! Whose city? OUR city! #Occupy #4436cc

Yours,

Bryan Sanders

http://bryansanders.com/4436.html

@nayrbgo

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Culver City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken Jones May 10, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Maybe more to the point, where does the methane (way more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas)Read More release go from the fracking process, where do the "secret"and other cancer causing chemicals go, and who pays for clean-up costs, increased healthcare costs of residents nearby, possible increased earthquake damage, etc. and where does this oil go (we can't use it--too dirty--so probably China)?
Theodora Crawford May 10, 2013 at 03:09 pm
As I understand it, fracking wells "dry up" fairly quickly, which is why pressure to keepRead More drilling so urgent. Where do the jobs go after a year or so? Just a thought....
Adam Rakunas April 8, 2013 at 06:45 pm
This non-apology is a joke. Still not going spend money in Culver City, dude.
Marco Anderson April 8, 2013 at 01:51 pm
Steve Rose writes "I'm a responsible car driver and I look for the same from bike riders."Read More However I challenge him to spend his next long drive staying at exactly the posted speed limit. I tried this once driving from the Long Beach Airport to Irvine. And I was astounded at how slow this felt. I also noticed that in all contexts (Freeway, Arterial, and local road) I was the only one doing so. I didn't pass or pace a single other car for the full 30 minutes. So somehow I doubt that although he may be "responsible" driving he is a fully law-abiding driver.
Yosi Sergant April 8, 2013 at 09:30 am
(....continued) Mr. Rose, your heart might have been in the right place, but you asked the wrongRead More questions and alienated bike riders in the process. More important, the approach was simply confrontational and not reflective of the changing perspective (read: progress) of the broader city on bicycle riding nor of the amazing new life blood of the those who are revitalizing the very Culver City you love and have worked so very hard for. Again, I urge you to apologize (not clarify) and perhaps come speak to some bike commuters/riders and join us in making Culver City's road's, less territorial and safer...